On appeal against conviction: Held, allowing the appeal, that there was no evidence that what the appellant did to his wife was any more backbreaking or painful than tattooing, which, if carried out with the consent of an adult, did not build an offence under section 47 of the Act of 1861 albeit that unfeigned bodily harm was deliberately inflicted; that there was no wolfish intent on the part of the appellant and it was not in the public interest that such consensual activity among maintain and wife in the privacy of the matrimonial collection eggshell should be a matter for criminal inv estigation or prosecution under section 47; ! and that, accordingly, the conviction would be quashed (post, pp. 50A-B, E-G). Rex v. Donovan [1934] 2 K.B. 498, C C A . and Reg. v. Brown (Anthony) [1994] 1 A.C. 212, H.L.(E.) distinguished. The following cases are referred to in the judgment: Reg. v. Brown (Anthony) [1994] 1 A . C 212; [1993] 2 W.L.R. 556; [1993] 2 All E.R. 75, H.L.(E.) Rex v. Donovan [1934] 2 K.B. 498, C...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.